Eve’s Story: The Value of Shared Decision-Making

Eve shares her experience of having cannulas inserted for routine surgeries most of which were never used, highlighting the importance of assessing IV access needs and genuinely partnering with patients in decision-making.

Eve’s story aligns with the 2021 Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care Management of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters Clinical Care Standard, particularly Quality Statements 1 & 2.

Quality Statement 1 – Assessment for insertion
Ensuring a PIVC is inserted only when clinically indicated, following appropriate assessment and shared decision-making.

Quality Statement 2 – Informed consent and communication
Providing patients (and/or carers) with clear information about risks, benefits, and alternatives, and involving them in decisions about their care.

Recent Stories

Fiona’s Story: The Need to Review Cannula Placement

Fiona went to the ED and had a cannula inserted quickly. Although successful on the first attempt, it was placed near her elbow, causing discomfort, and the nurse didn’t explain the procedure, seek her input, or discuss potential complications. Her experience highlights the importance of reviewing the ongoing need for cannulas and removing or replacing them safely if required.

Read More »

Ken’s Story: Avoiding the Cubital Fossa

Ken, a patient with a long history of cannulas due to haematological cancer and monthly venesections, urges clinicians to avoid the cubital fossa and use alternative forearm sites. Ignoring this not only risks veins with scarring but also restricts movement and comfort while waiting in the ED.

Read More »
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.