Fiona’s Story: A Cannula Without a Conversation

Fiona went to the ED and had a cannula inserted with minimal explanation, no discussion of risks, and no opportunity for input highlighting the importance of talking to patients and avoiding unnecessary “just-in-case” cannulas.


 Fiona’s story aligns with 2021 Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care Management of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters Clinical Care Standard, particularly Quality Statements 1 and 2.

More Real Life Story

Daniel’s Story

Daniel had a PIVC inserted by ambulance staff that remained in situ for four days, rather than being removed within 24 hours or upon transfer to the ward. He subsequently developed line related sepsis.

As a result, instead of being discharged home, Daniel required admission to ICU followed by inpatient rehabilitation. This extended length of stay incurred an estimated additional cost of approximately $38,000 to the health service.

This story aligns with ACSQHC Quality Statement 10

Recent Stories

Fiona’s Story: The Need to Review Cannula Placement

Fiona went to the ED and had a cannula inserted quickly. Although successful on the first attempt, it was placed near her elbow, causing discomfort, and the nurse didn’t explain the procedure, seek her input, or discuss potential complications. Her experience highlights the importance of reviewing the ongoing need for cannulas and removing or replacing them safely if required.

Read More »

Ken’s Story: Avoiding the Cubital Fossa

Ken, a patient with a long history of cannulas due to haematological cancer and monthly venesections, urges clinicians to avoid the cubital fossa and use alternative forearm sites. Ignoring this not only risks veins with scarring but also restricts movement and comfort while waiting in the ED.

Read More »
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.